Category Archives: Events

Between exam stress and assignments – surviving exam period

Anyone who followed our Instagram channel closely during the last exam period or was a regular visitor to the university library will certainly have seen our survey on learning habits during exam stress. We don’t want to keep the results from you, so we have summarised the votes and opinions we received in this blog post. The specific answers can be viewed in the image gallery at the end of the post.

During the examination period of the 2025 summer semester, we asked students between 21 July and 17 August 2025 about their impressions and habits during this stressful time full of exams and assignments in order to get a small snapshot of the mood and encourage some discussion. A total of eight questions were formulated for this purpose, with a new question being published every Tuesday and Thursday. On Tuesdays, the question could be answered in an Instagram story; on Thursdays, a flipchart was set up in the foyer of the university library for answers to be written down, parallel to the online survey. The questions were:

  • Do you procrastinate during exam time?
  • Do you learn with or without music?
  • Study group or lone fighter?
  • What helps you relax during exam stress?
  • Do you learn digitally or analogue?
  • Morning grouch or sunshine?
  • Which learning place is best for you?
  • Do you break principles during exam time? If so, which ones?

The flipchart was used extensively throughout – for open questions, the space was almost always completely filled with answers, and for decision-making questions, an average of 345 people cast their votes. On Instagram, the response rate was heavily dependent on the wording of the question, as only three answers were received on average for open questions. Unfortunately, due to our statistical settings, we were unable to determine the exact number of votes cast on decision-making questions afterwards.

Evaluation of the results

The question ‘Morning grouch or sunshine?’ yielded a clear result: approximately two-thirds (64.5%) of participants considered themselves morning grouches, i.e. they work most productively in the afternoon or evening. In comparison, only 35.5% of participants said they were ‘sunshine’ types who use the morning to study. This distribution corresponds with our observations that there was only a moderate crowd of people in the library in the morning, while in the afternoon (almost) all workstations were occupied.

We had the impression that most of the participants were preparing for exams on their own. This assessment is confirmed by the finding that 80% of participants study alone. They probably mainly used our reading room (16%) and the open stack area (54%), which are well suited for independent work due to their quiet working atmosphere. In contrast, 20% of participants stated that they prepared for exams in study groups. If they used the library as a meeting place, they probably chose the common area (22%), whose informal atmosphere and space for exchange offer perfect conditions for this type of work. However, 8% of participants also rated our reading garden as a suitable place to study, which was ideal in the warm summer weather – and for an active break, our table tennis table was ready and waiting.

A narrow majority (52%) of participants prefer digital learning, while 48% favour analogue learning materials. A similarly close result was obtained when asked whether they learn with or without music: 52% of participants learn in silence, while 40.5% work with music in the background. For 15% of participants who used the flipchart for this question, their preference depends on the situation – this is how we interpreted the sticky dots on the dividing line between the two given answer options.

However, music is also good for relaxing or relieving frustration – depending on the genre you listen to. Music was mentioned several times as a remedy for exam stress, alongside other creative activities such as painting, drawing and knitting. Some distracted themselves with games or entertainment shows such as Little Britain and Mr Bean, while others spent time with family and friends. Other participants became active to clear their heads, for example through sport, walks, dancing or shopping. Classic remedies were also mentioned, such as eating, soft drinks, any form of caffeine and good old procrastination – who isn’t familiar with that? During exam periods, even tidying up, doing laundry and taking glass to the glass collection container can be fun – or you can scroll through social media until you realise with a shock how quickly time has passed. When stress becomes too much, some participants find it helpful to give free rein to their feelings by crying or losing their temper. Sometimes, sarcasm seems to be one of the only things that helps, as illustrated by the response ‘de-registration’. In addition to the remedies already mentioned, breaks were very important for many participants, as expressed in the following answers: breaks, planning time for oneself, slow mornings, power naps, switching off and getting enough sleep.

But it seems that the very things that help against exam stress are often neglected. This is confirmed by the results of the question “Do you break principles during exam time? If so, which ones?‘: Although breaks were considered very important, they are sometimes overlooked during exam stress, with leisure time and sleep also having to subordinate to the workload. Health also comes second, as evidenced by skipping workout sessions or unhealthy eating habits. Some participants also resort to a calming cigarette when stressed.

Perhaps you recognise yourself in some of the answers and have picked up some new ideas for dealing with exam stress. We hope you got through the exam period well and were able to recharge during the semester break. We wish you all the best for the new semester and remember that many other students feel the same way during stressful times. 🙂

Last but not least: Many thanks to all participants who took the time to answer the questions!

Picture gallery: Distribution of votes and answers

Open Access: Yes – but not at any cost!

Open Access Week 2024

Open Access Week 2024 – Change my mind!

The panelists agree on the fact that “Open Access is important and the right way” – but not at all costs.

Adherents of Chemnitz University of Technology on the fields of research and teaching, junior scientists and students met the Open Science Team last week within the International Open Access Week

On Monday, Magdalena Lemke from the Open Science Initiative of the Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences started within an event of the student initiative “Critical Introduction Days” (KRETA) with a sceptic question and a reflected answer: “Science for All? Open Science and capitalist structures”. Within the workshop, not only interesting information about objectives of Open Science, the history of Open Access and current developments were presented – but also critical topics like high publication charges and the re-emerging monopoly position of some publishers were intensively discussed.

The day after, the Open Science Team made the more or less provocative assumption “All research results shall be open to the public. CHANGE MY MIND!”. This statement provoked discussions – some were immediately convinced, others questioned this assumption and talked about barriers and doubts. In that way, a valuable exchange resulted enabling a mutual insight in the publication culture and practice of different subjects on the one hand and in the (Open Science) services of the Library on the other.

On Thursday, the Open Science Team met with invited speakers and interested persons for a controversial discussion. The contributions included criticism towards excessive charges for Open Access articles as well as the partly deficient quality of peer review-procedures applying to Open Access- as well as to Non-Open Access-journals. In particular, the business practices of the Open Access-publisher MDPI was criticized. The mass sending of emails to authors inviting for publication, editorial activities or reviews were judged as especially annoying. However, the publisher also includes recognized journals with high impact and DOAJ-Seal (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) as quality label. For this reason, a particularly comprehensive check of the respective journal is recommendable.

Extremely high article processing charges such as raised by Nature may exclude certain user groups from publication. In this context, the publishers argue with their high editorial expenses. Research results may be made openly accessible currently also without costs on preprintservers. However, in general they are not reviewed. In addition, publishers and/ or Academies of Sciences may offer scientific publications of particularly high quality in the form of special editions or generate added value by abstracts. The particularly challenging publishing conditions for doctoral students were aborded as well. Severe time constraints may force for selection of publishers with short review delays. A comment from the audience addressed also cumulative academic works which have to be published in compliance with legal regulations. In the end, the interesting discussion had to be terminated for the moment due to time restrictions. The event was a successful start for a mutual exchange which has to be continued in any case.

The dedication of awards to Open Access-pioneers at Chemnitz University of Technology was the conclusion and the highlight of the activities within the Open Access Week. Awards in different categories rewarded the engagement on different paths to Open Access: the Green Way (publications in repositories, 2023), the Golden Way (publications in Gold-Open Access-journals, 2023) and the Diamond Way (management of the Open Access-journal “Journal for Semiotics”) being published as print by Stauffenburg Publishing. The editors, Professur Fricke and Dr. Siefkes, were awarded for their successful negotiations for time-shift Open Access-publishing of the editions.

Awarded as well was the first University Library-funded Open Access monograph “Deutsche Jüd_innen in Chile: Bürger:innenwerdung im Kontext von historischen Verflechtungen und Rassismusinformationen“ by Dr. Ana Maria Troncoso. This book will be shortly available at Transcript Publishing with the license CC BY 4.0.

We thank all participants for the interesting conversations, opinions and discussions and are looking forward to jointly further promote and enhance Open Science.

Save the Date: 2 July 2020 – Online information event on Open Access publishing under terms of the Wiley DEAL

Project DEAL – What is it?

The DEAL project was initiated by the Alliance of German Science Organisations. The aim of the operation is to negotiate Germany-wide licence agreements for online journals of the three largest scientific publishers: Wiley, Springer Nature and Elsevier.

Beyond the aim of gaining access to all the contents of the publishers’ own journals, the main focus is on systematically converting the future publication output of all participating research institutions to open access. In order to achieve this, one of the project group’s main negotiating points is that scientists and scholars from all participating institutions should in principle be able to publish their research articles in open access.

The negotiations with the publishers Wiley (since 2019) and Springer Nature (since 2020) have already successfully led to agreements. TU Chemnitz participates in both of these DEAL agreements, so that the university’s researchers are not only granted access to the contents of thousands of journals published by Springer Nature and Wiley, but are also entitled to publish their research articles in the journals of both publishers entirely in open access, without any administrative effort of their own or individual costs. Instead, the University Library will handle the funding and clearing of these fees.

So what exactly is the Wiley-DEAL?

Den Beitrag weiterlesen Save the Date: 2 July 2020 – Online information event on Open Access publishing under terms of the Wiley DEAL